Heatproof
Expert report · Preview

Expert report

The German version is the legal document for a dispute in Germany; this is the same report in English.

Example report from recorded data of a Vitocal 250-A with settings faults re-created. Not your system.
Heatproof · Expert reportReport 893FC01614 · Preview · As of 07/11/2026 · DRAFT
Seasonal efficiency
2.74
Reference
3.0
Verdict
below reference
Score 50/100 · Act

The heat pump reaches a seasonal efficiency of 2.74 this year. The reference is 3.0. The system stays below it. 4 of 5 findings concern settings or sizing, the installer's area of responsibility at planning and commissioning.

1 · System and data basis

System
Viessmann Vitocal 250-A · Serial –
Client
–
Installer
–
Data source
Example data (PyViCare, recorded)
Method
Unit's computed heat balance (manufacturer-reported), not verified against heat meters
Concern
Preview without an order

2 · Readings and classification

ValueResultStatusNote
Seasonal efficiency (COP), current year2.74ActReference 3.0 · Score 50/100
Electricity, current year4,886 kWhPrevious year 7,592 kWh
Heat delivered, current year13,407 kWhUnit's computed heat balance (manufacturer-reported), not verified against heat meters
Excess against the reference423 kWh · about 106 € a yearActat 0.25 €/kWh; computed from efficiency and yearly consumption
Comparison with heat-metered homesbetter than 11 % of 139 homesReference fleet HeatpumpMonitor.org (UK), yearly values; context, not a yardstick
Heating curve (slope · shift)1.1 · +7Actslope very steep
Flow / return29.8 / 34.2 °CInfounit idle now
Flow rate0.0 l/minInfounit idle now
Compressor starts per running hour3.06 /hCheckcycles often
Hot-water tank58.5 °CCheckvery hot: costs efficiency
§ 14a grid module14aOffInfodiscount available

3 · Indications of causes

Result
Seasonal efficiency 2.74 below the reference 3.0

The system delivers 2.74 kilowatt-hours of heat per kilowatt-hour of electricity. The reference for subsidies and usual planning is 3.0. Whether settings, sizing or the device are the cause is what the following findings show.

To be produced by the installer: Commissioning record, proof of hydraulic balancing, heat-load calculation and the efficiency named in the quote.
Commissioning setting
Heating curve too steep (slope 1.1)

The heating curve sets how hot the heating water gets in cold weather. A slope of 1.0 or more is high for a house with radiators and costs 2 to 3 % electricity per degree too much. The installer sets the curve at commissioning and adjusts it after the first winter.

To be produced by the installer: Setting values from the commissioning record, design flow temperature from the heat-load calculation.
Commissioning setting
Heating-curve shift high (+7)

The shift raises the heating-water temperature in any weather. Values from +6 point to a workaround for another problem, such as an unbalanced heating circuit.

To be produced by the installer: Reason for the shift, proof of hydraulic balancing.
Commissioning setting
Electric backup heater supplied 8 % of the electricity

The backup heater heats three times as expensively as the heat pump and should only run in severe cold or a fault. A high share points to tight sizing, a wrongly set bivalence point or a fault.

To be produced by the installer: Bivalence point and backup-heater release as set, heat-load calculation, fault log.
Sizing and hydraulics
About 3.1 compressor starts per running hour

A compressor that switches on and off all the time uses more electricity and wears faster. Usual causes: a system too large for the house, no buffer tank, too little flow, closed radiator valves. That concerns planning and hydraulics.

To be produced by the installer: Heat-load calculation, buffer-tank sizing, minimum flow rate, minimum run-time setting.

4 · Responsibility and legal position

4 of the 5 findings concern settings or sizing, that is, work the installer is responsible for at planning and commissioning: Heating curve too steep (slope 1.1); Heating-curve shift high (+7); Electric backup heater supplied 8 % of the electricity; About 3.1 compressor starts per running hour.

The legal position: after acceptance the customer must prove a defect (§§ 634, 640 BGB). The limitation period is, on the prevailing view, five years from acceptance because the system becomes part of the building (§ 634a (1) no. 2 BGB); there is no ruling from the Federal Court yet. This report documents the state of the system on the reference date from its own data and names the documents the installer should produce. It is a private expert opinion: in court, a court-appointed expert decides and can use this report as a basis.

5 · Recommended steps

  1. Send a defect notice with a 14-day deadline to the installer and attach this report. The draft is ready under “Letters”.
  2. Request the documents: commissioning record, heat-load calculation, proof of hydraulic balancing, quote with the promised efficiency.
  3. After the remedy, wait two cold weeks and have it re-measured; the Heatproof account stays connected for that.
  4. If no remedy follows: consumer advice centre or a construction lawyer, with this report and the documents.
  5. Keep the deadline in view: acceptance date plus five years on the prevailing view, two years on the narrower one.

6 · Limits of this report

  • Data source: Example data (PyViCare, recorded). Method: Unit's computed heat balance (manufacturer-reported), not verified against heat meters.
  • The basis is a snapshot of the settings plus the device's yearly and monthly counters. Hourly history only exists with a live connection.
  • The reference fleet consists of British heat-metered homes. Climate and buildings differ; the comparison gives context, it does not measure.
  • Not a court expert opinion, not legal advice. The expert confirms the method and plausibility of the analysis, not the manufacturer's readings.
  • If the data do not support a statement, the report says so and the fee is refunded.

7 · Co-signature

[Name of the expert]
Licensed expert for refrigeration and heat-pump technology, [Place]
Heatproof · analysis by published method v0.5
As of 07/11/2026

The co-signature confirms: the analysis follows the published method, the findings are plausible from the data at hand, and the classification into setting, sizing, usage and device matches the state of the art.

Annex · monthly values (kWh electricity)

MonthTotalHeatingHot water
Oct 2025694623
Sept 202517346127
Aug 202540040
Jul 202559059
Jun 202545045
May 2025931578
Apr 2025400292108
Mar 2025970765205
Feb 20251,4331,179253
Jan 20251,6051,301304
Dec 20241,4901,192298
Nov 20241,050796254
Prüfbericht · Heatproof